At Hanson Environmental Study Centre (HESC), there's recently been a bit of a kerfuffle over bird ID, in particular regarding the separation of the similarly-sized Marsh and Willow Tit. These two species are very alike and, in the absence of a qualified bird ringer and all their mist netting paraphernalia, are best identified by call.
Reading Birds Britannica by Mark Cocker and Richard Mabey, I was amazed to discover that the Willow Tit was not recognised as a separate British species until 1900. This followed some clever detective work by two German ornithologists in 1897, who discovered a couple of mis-identified Marsh Tit skins in a tray at the British Museum. What a day that must have been.
The Willow Tit, Parus montanus, has grey-brown plumage above and off white plumage below. It has a black cap, a black bib and white panels on the sides of the head. Just like a Marsh Tit, Parus palustris. To be fair, it's reckoned that if you had a specimen of each side by side, the Willow would have a more pronounced bull neck, making it like a 'stretched limo' version of the Marsh.
For the last century, it has been thought that the most obvious difference, and I use the word 'obvious' advisedly, is the presence on the Willow of a pale panel on the secondaries of the folded wing. But as Willows can lose this in summer through abrasion and a newly-moulted Marsh could have a suggestion of a pale panel, it's not a definitive distinction. In the Willow, the dark crown is supposed to be dull, whereas in the Marsh, it is glossy. However with changing light conditions, that's never going to be an easy call. My thanks to the Collins Bird Guide (Britain and Europe) for those few facts.
Should anyone care about this, apart from the hordes of pedantic, obsessive birders who fret over stuff like this all the time? Well, both birds are on the British Red Data List and the reasons for their decline are not fully understood. Without that understanding, it is difficult to know which habitat management techniques to deploy to prevent further loss of numbers and the real threat of extinction of these species within these shores.
And so to their calls. Until relatively recently, this was the best diagnostic tool available to split the two species. The Marsh Tit has a distinctive 'pitchoo' call (scroll down here, click and listen), whilst the Willow Tit has a 'zi-zi taah taah taah' call (scroll down here, click and listen).
Easy, eh? But what happens if neither of them are calling? In the last few years, it has been realised that the Marsh Tit has a small white patch at the base of its bill. This is absent in the Willow Tit. The only trouble is, neither species is very good at sitting still and carefully angling its head so that you can have a jolly good look.
Have I mentioned that of the two, Willow Tit is more likely to be found near water? Or that Marsh Tit inhabits broad-leaved woods. Honestly, it's enough to make Miss Marple throw in the towel and take up pole dancing.
On Saturday, whilst the light was great, The Admiral and I ventured down to HESC and found ourselves in the Woodland Hide in the company of The Singer (**new character alert**). We all sat, watching three black-capped tits visiting the feeders and tried to figure out whether we had three Marsh, or two Marsh and a Willow. I hadn't taken along my camera, which was a shame because, as I said, the light was great. None of the birds were calling, but one did seem to have a larger head.
On Sunday afternoon, The Admiral and I returned, camera'd to the eyeballs, to be greeted by swirling fog and two black-capped tits, either two Marsh or one of each. I did manage to capture one image of a Marsh, but as the light was poor, it was nothing to write home about. A bird, sounding not unlike a Willow Tit, was calling, but whether it was one of the two birds we were looking at was another matter.
Definitely, absolutely, positively a Marsh Tit, I think! |
I am left with the odd feeling that on Saturday we saw but did not hear a Willow Tit, whilst on Sunday we heard but did not see a Willow Tit. Everything else was Marsh.
To be continued...
10 comments:
A real puzzler.
If only birds wore name badges, like they do in the supermarket.
In these politically correct times, I think we're supposed to call them 'retail experience facilitators', whatever their gender!
Do the R'E'F' wear black caps with white bits at the base of their beaks? And are they ever found to sing?
So do you get either Marsh or Willow Tits in the garden then during Garden Birdwatch?
Right I'll now added some more fuel to the fire :0) there was a time when Willow tit was the only one of the two ever recorded at HESC. WT are more akin to wet scrub/woodland and are generally fond of ex-mineral sites as per one of their current remaining UK strongholds in the old Nottinghamshire/Derbyshire collieries. Current status - MT seem now to be holding their own while the WT continues to spiral down the plug hole! Phew when I started that last sentence I had a sudden desire to quite a famous piece of cricket commentary :0)
Martin, sorry, I'm a bit slow tonight, only just worked out what R.E.F. STOOD for! I think you'd probably have to choose the 'right' kind of shop for those services. As far as the BGBW is concerned, either would be a major shock, so only in my dreams.
JD, if you want to continue the cricketing analogy. That was my century for the year, plus, currently 111 posts about Places (a single Nelson) and 222 total posts altogether (a double Nelson). Now back to my other occupation, trying to bowl a maiden over. Who said "No balls"?!
But you've already bowled a maiden over! The good lady, surely?
True, JD, true. I guess you could say that we've been at Tea since the early Eighties, rain then stopped play very briefly before a declaration was made in 1985. :o)
Aha! Maybe we should be listening out for the sound of leather on Willow, and see (hear?) if it's any different to the sound of leather on Marsh....??
Ouch! I don't think I'll be joining you on a bat walk any time soon! I quite liked Aha though, in their day :o)
Post a Comment